[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160229173528.GP5083@two.firstfloor.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:35:28 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, jolsa@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
alexander.shishkin@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf, tools, script: Add support for printing
assembler
> What kernel have you used for testing this? 4.5-rc? I'm having trouble
> with intel_pt with 4.5.0-rc4 :-\
Works for me (on -rc5). What problem do you see?
>
> And while this looks like a great feature to have, have you considered
> using what is in tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/ somehow, so that we
> don't end up adding one more dependency on another external library?
This needs a text disassembler.
The PT decoder doesn't have a disassembler unfortunately. The kernel
instruction decoder is also not a text disassembler. Changing it to do
that would be a quite large project.
> It would be great if we could, if done that way, perhaps at some point
> we could stop using objdump somehow :-\
objdump does a lot of work to line up the source code correctly.
Reproducing it would be a lot of work in perf too, and need
large scales changes. Perhaps at some time, but not any time
soon.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists