[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160229175816.GE3615@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:58:17 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Petr Cermak <petrcermak@...omium.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/18] mm, proc: make clear_refs killable
On 02/29, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> On Mon 29-02-16 18:38:45, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > In this case you do not need put_task_struct().
>
> Why not? Both are after get_proc_task which takes a reference to the
> task...
Yes, but we already have put_task_struct(task) in the "out_mm" path, so
"goto out_mm" should work just fine?
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists