linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/18] mm, proc: make clear

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160229180200.GO16930@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:	Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:02:00 +0100
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
	Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
	Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Petr Cermak <petrcermak@...omium.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/18] mm, proc: make clear_refs killable

On Mon 29-02-16 18:58:17, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 02/29, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >
> > On Mon 29-02-16 18:38:45, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > 
> > > In this case you do not need put_task_struct().
> > 
> > Why not? Both are after get_proc_task which takes a reference to the
> > task...
> 
> Yes, but we already have put_task_struct(task) in the "out_mm" path, so
> "goto out_mm" should work just fine?

OK, got what you mean now. That's what I did and is on the way. I just
thought you mean that put_task_struct is implicit for other reason.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs