[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXiTAr0H=GG62oN_42LpmkWTQuj-fjuvh0pduOz0b67Zg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:55:40 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] x86: Various SYSENTER/SYSEXIT/#DB fixes and cleanups
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> While I was doing all this, I also noticed that DR6 and BTF handling
> in do_debug was a bit off. Two of the patches in here try to fix it
> up.
It's worth noting that do_debug is really quite screwed up with or
without this patchset applied. For example:
/*
* Let others (NMI) know that the debug stack is in use
* as we may switch to the interrupt stack.
*/
debug_stack_usage_inc();
/* It's safe to allow irq's after DR6 has been saved */
preempt_disable();
cond_local_irq_enable(regs);
This has never really been valid. It should be guarded by an
if(user_mode(regs)). And we need to kill the die_notifier garbage in
here -- it makes it basically impossible to understand what's going
on.
--Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists