[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56D4D782.3010503@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 15:42:58 -0800
From: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
To: Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@...iumnetworks.com>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 4/5] arm64, numa: Add NUMA support for arm64 platforms.
On 02/29/2016 09:34 AM, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 22.02.16 17:58:22, David Daney wrote:
>> From: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@...iumnetworks.com>
>>
>> Attempt to get the memory and CPU NUMA node via of_numa. If that
>> fails, default the dummy NUMA node and map all memory and CPUs to node
>> 0.
>>
>> Tested-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@...aro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@...iumnetworks.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 26 +++
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h | 12 ++
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h | 45 +++++
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 10 +
>> arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 10 +
>> arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 4 +
>> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 4 +
>> arch/arm64/mm/Makefile | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 34 +++-
>> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 403 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 11 files changed, 545 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
>
>> +static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void))
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + nodes_clear(numa_nodes_parsed);
>> + nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
>> + nodes_clear(node_online_map);
>> + numa_free_distance();
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cleanup for any previous numa_alloc_distance()
>> +
>> + ret = numa_alloc_distance();
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>
> If you move this before the remaining initializers, you will need to
> clean this up on error.
Yes, we do this. See above.
> So better move it back after
> numa_register_nodes() as it was in v10. This should work since
> distances are used not earlier than numa is enabled.
I moved it here for a reason.
The init_func (of_numa_init() in this case) makes callbacks that use the
numa_distance object. We need to allocate it before using it.
Allocating it after calling the init_func() is too late.
>
> -Robert
>
>> +
>> + ret = init_func();
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + if (nodes_empty(numa_nodes_parsed))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + ret = numa_register_nodes();
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + setup_node_to_cpumask_map();
>> +
>> + /* init boot processor */
>> + cpu_to_node_map[0] = 0;
>> + map_cpu_to_node(0, 0);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists