[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160301204001.5594bed3@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 20:40:01 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
Hi Ingo,
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 08:07:50 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > This build is done with a PowerPC hosted cross compiler with no glibc.
>
> Ugh, what a rare and weird way to build an x86 kernel, and you made linux-next
> dependent on it?
It is just the fastest hardware I currently have access to (you remember
who I work for, right? ;-)). I have always done at least part of the
linux-next building (daily, or overnight) on PowerPC hardware and this
is only the 2nd or third time in over 8 years that it has found an
issue like this.
> > I assume that some things here need to be built with HOSTCC?
>
> I suspect that's the culprit.
Good, hopefully it is not too hard to fix.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists