linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: defconfig: Enable samsung MFD and related configs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <56D568B1.10808@samsung.com>
Date:	Tue, 01 Mar 2016 15:32:25 +0530
From:	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
To:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski.k@...il.com>,
	catalin.marinas@....com, arnd@...db.de, olof@...om.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: defconfig: Enable samsung MFD and related configs



On 03/01/2016 02:27 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 2016-02-14 14:08 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>:
>> W dniu 05.02.2016 o 15:04, Alim Akhtar pisze:
>>> Exynos7 based espresso board uses S2MPS15, a multifunction device.
>>> This patch enables S2MPS1X regulator, pmic-clk and rtc drivers utilized by
>>> the same.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes since v2:
>>> * Added Reviewed-by from Krzysztof
>>> * rebased on next-20160204
>>>
>>> Changes since v1:
>>> * updated the comment message to describe which platfrom uses it.
>>> * enable COMMON_CLK_S2MPS11 which is needed to enable pmic-clk block.
>>>
>>>   arch/arm64/configs/defconfig |    3 +++
>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>
>> Applying this to my tree would cause conflicts with commit efdda175c07f:
>> arm64: defconfig: add spmi and usb related configs
>> Conflicts are trivial (simple additions) but maybe it is better to avoid
>> them.
>>
>> Olof/Arnd/Kevin, can you apply this directly to arm-soc?
>
> Never mind, applied because I have one more defconfig patch. The
> conflict will be still there but easy to solve.
>
Thanks Krzysztof, will take care of conflict with your tree in future.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>