lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHrxqh1f7acat9n1VJDKvPuL+x4ZSLWYTa-+RXEsg3Z6CMoxqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 1 Mar 2016 12:00:08 +0100
From:	Johan de Jong <jrdejong@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: SCSI sr driver: parallel writes to optical serialized which hurts
 performance (sr_mutex)

Dear developers,

(Please CC me as I am not subscribed (yet))

Writing (backing up) to multiple optical drives at the same time results in
a performance loss of about 7-10 times compared to writing to a single
drive.

After digging around it seems the problem arose about 5 years ago after the
Big Kernel Lock removal and the introduction of the new "sr_mutex" private
mutex in drivers/scsi/sr.c, which locks on a per driver basis instead of a
per device basis.

Various reports by users are listed on this issue on various mailing lists,
so I think there is interest for a solution in the linux community. So far,
it looks like this has not attracted the attention of, or not been
identified as a priority by, any of the kernel developers. However, I think
a Linux based DIY server with multiple optical drives for the purpose of
backing up files in multiple offline copies is a very useful application
and it would be unfortunate if the current behavior keeps such an
application unfeasible.

Would someone be willing to look into this and/or comment on the issue?

Sincerely,
Johan de Jong

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ