linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv7 2/3] IB/core: added support to use rdma cgroup controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56D577CC.1070107@mellanox.com>
Date:	Tue, 1 Mar 2016 13:06:52 +0200
From:	Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>
To:	Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@...il.com>
CC:	<cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, <lizefan@...wei.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
	Liran Liss <liranl@...lanox.com>,
	"Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
	<serge@...lyn.com>, Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
	Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>, <raindel@...lanox.com>,
	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 2/3] IB/core: added support to use rdma cgroup
 controller

On 01/03/2016 11:22, Parav Pandit wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com> wrote:
>> On 28/02/2016 16:13, Parav Pandit wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
>>> index 00da80e..54ea8ce 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
>>> @@ -343,28 +343,38 @@ int ib_register_device(struct ib_device *device,
>>>
>>>       ret = read_port_immutable(device);
>>>       if (ret) {
>>> -             printk(KERN_WARNING "Couldn't create per port immutable data %s\n",
>>> -                    device->name);
>>> +             pr_warn("Couldn't create per port immutable data %s\n",
>>> +                     device->name);
>>>               goto out;
>>
>> This change doesn't belong in the patch.
> I agree, but few warnings are with pr_warn and few with printk just
> make code look uneven.
> So I changed printk to pr_warn in same function instead of spinning
> complete new patch.
Still, I think it would be better to have such cosmetic changes in a
separate patch, so that we have a cleaner git history. You can send 
this extra patch separately from this patchset so that Doug can take 
it independently.