linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: qoriq: allow building as module with THERMAL=m

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4312477.lDX3yCWWFs@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Tue, 01 Mar 2016 03:00:22 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: qoriq: allow building as module with THERMAL=m

On Monday, February 29, 2016 05:04:20 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> My previous patch to avoid link errors with the qoriq cpufreq
> driver disallowed all of the broken cases, but also prevented
> the driver from being built when CONFIG_THERMAL is a module.
> 
> This changes the dependency to allow the cpufreq driver to
> also be a module in this case, just not built-in.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Fixes: cpufreq: qoriq depends on thermal
> ---
> 
> If possible, please fold this change directly into the previous
> commit

Done.

I've applied the [2/2] too.

Thanks,
Rafael