[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAeU0aPXTWSO776giVFtUWgPvFiT_ofA=kW23KUkFawA-EYjMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 05:39:47 -0800
From: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@...gle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Nauman Rafique <nauman@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: flush inode cgroup wb switches
instead of pinning super_block
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Tahsin, can you please verify that this removes the asynchronous
> behavior while still avoiding the original issue?
>
I verified that this fixes the original issue and also removes the
asynchronous umount behavior.
Thanks a lot for the fix.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists