lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAeU0aPXTWSO776giVFtUWgPvFiT_ofA=kW23KUkFawA-EYjMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 1 Mar 2016 05:39:47 -0800
From:	Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@...gle.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
	Nauman Rafique <nauman@...gle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: flush inode cgroup wb switches
 instead of pinning super_block

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Tahsin, can you please verify that this removes the asynchronous
> behavior while still avoiding the original issue?
>

I verified that this fixes the original issue and also removes the
asynchronous umount behavior.

Thanks a lot for the fix.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ