[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160301184327.148b3ad4@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 18:43:27 +0000
From: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Sergei Ianovich <ynvich@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com>,
Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>,
Joachim Eastwood <manabian@...il.com>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] serial: support for 16550A serial ports on LP-8x4x
> Maybe you just set a baud rate nearest to the one from the table in
> case of BOTHER?
This is broken. BOTHER can be set with a perfectly valid baud rate that
could equally be represented by B9600 say.
If you are stuck with limited ranges then
switch(baud) {
case 9600:
case 4800:
etc
and don't worry about BOTHER, it's entirely transparent to you. The core
kernel code will provide you with a baud rate number, the re-encoder will
always do the right thing.
A driver should never care about BOTHER or any of the baud bits in the
termios structure directly.
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists