linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86, pkeys: fix access_error() denial of writes to write-only VMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160301214402.GA20162@node.shutemov.name>
Date:	Wed, 2 Mar 2016 00:44:02 +0300
From:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
	avagin@...il.com, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, pkeys: fix access_error() denial of writes to
 write-only VMA

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 11:41:33AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> 
> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Andrey Wagin reported that a simple test case was broken by:
> 
> 	2b5f7d013fc ("mm/core, x86/mm/pkeys: Add execute-only protection keys support")
> 
> This test case creates an unreadable VMA and my patch assumed
> that all writes must be to readable VMAs.
> 
> The simplest fix for this is to remove the pkey-related bits
> in access_error().  For execute-only support, I believe the
> existing version is sufficient because the permissions we
> are trying to enforce are entirely expressed in vma->vm_flags.
> We just depend on pkeys to get *an* exception, it does not
> matter that PF_PK was set, or even what state PKRU is in.
> 
> I will re-add the necessary bits with the full pkeys
> implementation that includes the new syscalls.
> 
> The three cases that matter are:
> 
> 1. If a write to an execute-only VMA occurs, we will see PF_WRITE
>    set, but !VM_WRITE on the VMA, and return 1.  All execute-only
>    VMAs have VM_WRITE clear by definition.
> 2. If a read occurs on a present PTE, we will fall in to the "read,
>    present" case and return 1.
> 3. If a read occurs to a non-present PTE, we will miss the "read,
>    not present" case, because the execute-only VMA will have
>    VM_EXEC set, and we will properly return 0 allowing the PTE to
>    be populated.
> 
> Test program:
> 
> #include <sys/mman.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> 
> int main()
> {
> 	int *p;
> 	p = mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
> 	p[0] = 1;
> 
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> Fixes: 62b5f7d013fc ("mm/core, x86/mm/pkeys: Add execute-only protection keys support")
> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
> Cc: Andrey Wagin <avagin@...il.com>,
> Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
> Cc: x86@...nel.org

Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov