[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160302172831.GA15335@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 18:28:31 +0100
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa@....edu>,
Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 18/20] cpu/hotplug: Let upcoming cpu bring itself fully up
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 06:43:41PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> @@ -1204,7 +1212,7 @@ static bool cpuhp_is_ap_state(enum cpuhp
> {
> if (state >= CPUHP_AP_OFFLINE && state <= CPUHP_AP_ONLINE)
> return true;
FWIW, this test is superfluous after this change, because
CPUHP_BRINGUP_CPU is less than CPUHP_AP_OFFLINE.
> - return state > CPUHP_BP_ONLINE;
> + return state > CPUHP_BRINGUP_CPU;
> }
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists