linux-kernel - RE: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <VI1PR04MB1184697C38CA3BB034D4CFAEF4BC0@VI1PR04MB1184.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:53:30 +0000
From:	Jose Rivera <german.rivera@....com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"J. German Rivera" <German.Rivera@...escale.com>,
	Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@...tec.com>
Subject: RE: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the tip tree

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@...ah.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 11:44 AM
> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>; Ingo Molnar
> <mingo@...e.hu>; H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>; Peter Zijlstra
> <peterz@...radead.org>; linux-next@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; J. German Rivera <German.Rivera@...escale.com>;
> Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@...tec.com>
> Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the tip tree
> 
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 08:54:39AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in:
> > >
> > >   include/linux/irqdomain.h
> > >
> > > between commit:
> > >
> > >   29d5c8db26ad ("genirq: Add DOMAIN_BUS_IPI")
> > >
> > > from the tip tree and commit:
> > >
> > >   9b1b282ccd81 ("irqdomain: Added domain bus token
> > > DOMAIN_BUS_FSL_MC_MSI")
> > >
> > > from the staging tree.
> > >
> > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no
> > > action is required).
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cheers,
> > > Stephen Rothwell
> > >
> > > diff --cc include/linux/irqdomain.h
> > > index ed48594e96d2,0934d06c8b00..000000000000
> > > --- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> > > @@@ -74,7 -74,7 +74,8 @@@ enum irq_domain_bus_token
> > >   	DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI,
> > >   	DOMAIN_BUS_PLATFORM_MSI,
> > >   	DOMAIN_BUS_NEXUS,
> > >  +	DOMAIN_BUS_IPI,
> > > + 	DOMAIN_BUS_FSL_MC_MSI,
> >
> > Errm. What's that? Did that DOMAIN_BUS_FSL_MC_MSI thingy get any
> > review of the irq[domain] maintainers?
> 
> For some reason I thought it did, but in looking at the patch series, it doesn't
> seem like that happened :(
> 
> The patch series started with this message id on lkml:
> 	Message-ID: <1452117809-1870-1-git-send-email-
> German.Rivera@...escale.com>
> 
> German, any reason why you didn't cc: the irqdomain people on this series?
> 

This series was reviewed by Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
and Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>. I apologize if I
overlooked to CC Thomas as well.

Thanks,

German

> Thomas, should I revert the series until you have a chance to ack it?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h