linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] pwms: pwm-ti*: Remove support for local clock gating

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160302225413.GF4469@atomide.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 Mar 2016 14:54:13 -0800
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	"Franklin S Cooper Jr." <fcooper@...com>
Cc:	paul@...an.com, t-kristo@...com, vigneshr@...com,
	linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] pwms: pwm-ti*: Remove support for local clock
 gating

* Franklin S Cooper Jr. <fcooper@...com> [160302 11:41]:
> I know there are some comments regarding other patches in
> this patchset but this patch is unrelated and can be pulled
> in separately. Any objections to this or should I just
> resubmit this patch by itself?

No objections from me at least. If something needs to
change at the driver level, it sounds like a different
set of patches then.

Regards,

Tony