linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] x86/xsaves: Re-enable XSAVES

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160302005818.GA30963@test-lenovo>
Date:	Tue, 1 Mar 2016 16:58:18 -0800
From:	Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>,
	"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] x86/xsaves: Re-enable XSAVES

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 04:53:53PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Differences between i386 and x86-64 generally add problems, so unless this requires significant 32-bit-specific code we should not exclude i386 just because.

I have not seen any issues with 32-bit code, but will do some tests.
Thanks.

Yu-cheng