linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.4 115/342] namei: ->d_inode of a pinned dentry is stable only for positives

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160301234531.676235144@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 01 Mar 2016 23:54:21 +0000
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	<stable@...r.kernel.org>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 115/342] namei: ->d_inode of a pinned dentry is stable only for positives

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>

commit d4565649b6d6923369112758212b851adc407f0c upstream.

both do_last() and walk_component() risk picking a NULL inode out
of dentry about to become positive, *then* checking its flags and
seeing that it's not negative anymore and using (already stale by
then) value they'd fetched earlier.  Usually ends up oopsing soon
after that...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/namei.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -1742,11 +1742,11 @@ static int walk_component(struct nameida
 		if (err < 0)
 			return err;
 
-		inode = d_backing_inode(path.dentry);
 		seq = 0;	/* we are already out of RCU mode */
 		err = -ENOENT;
 		if (d_is_negative(path.dentry))
 			goto out_path_put;
+		inode = d_backing_inode(path.dentry);
 	}
 
 	if (flags & WALK_PUT)
@@ -3130,12 +3130,12 @@ retry_lookup:
 		return error;
 
 	BUG_ON(nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU);
-	inode = d_backing_inode(path.dentry);
 	seq = 0;	/* out of RCU mode, so the value doesn't matter */
 	if (unlikely(d_is_negative(path.dentry))) {
 		path_to_nameidata(&path, nd);
 		return -ENOENT;
 	}
+	inode = d_backing_inode(path.dentry);
 finish_lookup:
 	if (nd->depth)
 		put_link(nd);