linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: ti: Fix some errors found by static checkers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160301235532.GD4469@atomide.com>
Date:	Tue, 1 Mar 2016 15:55:33 -0800
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: ti: Fix some errors found by static checkers

* Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> [160301 10:55]:
> drivers/clk/ti/clk-814x.c:34:12: warning: symbol 'dm814x_adpll_early_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/clk/ti/clk-814x.c:58:12: warning: symbol 'dm814x_adpll_enable_init_clocks' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/clk/ti/adpll.c:465 ti_adpll_recalc_rate() warn: should '__readw(d->regs + 20) << 18' be a 64 bit type?
> drivers/clk/ti/adpll.c:945 ti_adpll_probe() error: we previously assumed 'd->clocks' could be null (see line 921)
> 
> The last one looks like a real bug because we don't return an
> error on allocation failure.

Yeah nice, that's a real bug:

Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>