[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160301234538.121370124@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 23:55:30 +0000
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<stable@...r.kernel.org>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 317/342] should_follow_link(): validate ->d_seq after having decided to follow
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
commit a7f775428b8f5808815c0e3004020cedb94cbe3b upstream.
... otherwise d_is_symlink() above might have nothing to do with
the inode value we've got.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/namei.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -1711,6 +1711,11 @@ static inline int should_follow_link(str
return 0;
if (!follow)
return 0;
+ /* make sure that d_is_symlink above matches inode */
+ if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU) {
+ if (read_seqcount_retry(&link->dentry->d_seq, seq))
+ return -ECHILD;
+ }
return pick_link(nd, link, inode, seq);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists