lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:13:38 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
lgirdwood@...il.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge
configuration
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 07:31:40AM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> Yaah, I agree.
> I had other option to use 0 as default, 1 as disable and 2 as enable. but
> generally for disable, we use 0 and for enable 1 and that's why I went to
> -1,0,1 approach.
> Will it be fine to have this as
> 0: Default i..e do not change.
> 1: disable.
> 2: Enable.
I'd suggest defining an enum here with default explicitly set to 0 but
yes.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists