[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160302090742.GA16954@pd.tnic>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 10:07:42 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jörg Rödel <joro@...tes.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>,
kvm ML <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kvm: Make KVM DF intercept configurable
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 07:45:53AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> To make this a serious debug feature, we should consider trapping all
> exceptions on request (and reinjecting the unhandled ones). Not sure
> right now, though, if that comes with more complications than the simple
> #DF case.
I can certainly try... Something like "intercept=<vector>,<vector>,..."
or so. Let me see how ugly it can get...
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists