[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160301234536.500890670@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 23:55:13 +0000
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<stable@...r.kernel.org>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 266/342] libceph: dont spam dmesg with stray reply warnings
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
commit cd8140c673d9ba9be3591220e1b2226d9e1e40d3 upstream.
Commit d15f9d694b77 ("libceph: check data_len in ->alloc_msg()")
mistakenly bumped the log level on the "tid %llu unknown, skipping"
message. Turn it back into a dout() - stray replies are perfectly
normal when OSDs flap, crash, get killed for testing purposes, etc.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/ceph/osd_client.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/ceph/osd_client.c
+++ b/net/ceph/osd_client.c
@@ -2843,8 +2843,8 @@ static struct ceph_msg *get_reply(struct
mutex_lock(&osdc->request_mutex);
req = __lookup_request(osdc, tid);
if (!req) {
- pr_warn("%s osd%d tid %llu unknown, skipping\n",
- __func__, osd->o_osd, tid);
+ dout("%s osd%d tid %llu unknown, skipping\n", __func__,
+ osd->o_osd, tid);
m = NULL;
*skip = 1;
goto out;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists