linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH] ASoC: atmel_ssc_dai: distinguish the different SSC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160302103304.GF18327@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 2 Mar 2016 19:33:05 +0900
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Songjun Wu <songjun.wu@...el.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tiwai@...e.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] ASoC: atmel_ssc_dai: distinguish the different SSC

On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 10:02:47AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Le 02/03/2016 02:04, Mark Brown a écrit :
> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:54:29AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:

> >> Signed-off-by: Songjun Wu <songjun.wu@...el.com>
> >> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>

> > I can't look at patches that aren't signed off, please see
> > SubmittingPatches for details.

> Songjun did sign the patch, I'm puzzled...

> Ah, you mean that I should have signed it myself as well as I am the
> actual sender... ok, as it's a "resend" like the subject says and that
> the first patch was actually sent by Songjun, I though it would be legit.

> Anyway, I'll resend it with my own Signed tag.

Yes, if you are posting a patch you need to include your signoff -
please see SubmittingPatches for details.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)