[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160302125901.GF6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 13:59:01 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tests: initialize sa.sa_flags
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 12:55:22PM +0000, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> The sa_flags field is not being initialized, so a garbage value is
> being passed to sigaction. Initialize it to zero.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/rdpmc.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/rdpmc.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/rdpmc.c
> index 7bb0d13..7945462 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/rdpmc.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/rdpmc.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ static int __test__rdpmc(void)
>
> sigfillset(&sa.sa_mask);
> sa.sa_sigaction = segfault_handler;
> + sa.sa_flags = 0;
Would not something like:
sa = (struct sigaction){
.sa_sigaction = segfault_handler,
};
sigfillset(&sa.sa_mask);
Be better?
> sigaction(SIGSEGV, &sa, NULL);
>
> fd = sys_perf_event_open(&attr, 0, -1, -1,
> --
> 2.7.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists