[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160302132251.GH16954@pd.tnic>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 14:22:51 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Mingarelli <thomas.mingarelli@....com>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>,
Javi Merino <javi.merino@....com>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
"Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>,
Gobinda Charan Maji <gobinda.cemk07@...il.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_linux@....org>,
openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 1/3] panic: Change nmi_panic from macro to function
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 02:18:24PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 02-03-16 19:36:26, Hidehiro Kawai wrote:
> [...]
> > +void nmi_panic(struct pt_regs *regs, const char *fmt, ...)
>
> Do we really need vargs? All the current users seem to be OK with a
> simple string. This makes the code slightly more complicated without any
> apparent reason.
I was just wondering the exactly same thing...
The contra-arg would be that in case someone wants to do nmi_panic()
with more than a string, then it won't work.
The question is, does nmi_panic() even need to dump something more than
regs and a string?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists