| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAAmzW4PHAsMvifgV2FpS_FYE78_PzDtADvoBY67usc_9-D4Hjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 22:57:50 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] mm, kswapd: replace kswapd compaction with waking
up kcompactd
2016-03-02 19:04 GMT+09:00 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>:
> On 03/02/2016 07:33 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> 4.5-rc1 4.5-rc1
>>> 3-test 4-test
>>> Minor Faults 106940795 106582816
>>> Major Faults 829 813
>>> Swap Ins 482 311
>>> Swap Outs 6278 5598
>>> Allocation stalls 128 184
>>> DMA allocs 145 32
>>> DMA32 allocs 74646161 74843238
>>> Normal allocs 26090955 25886668
>>> Movable allocs 0 0
>>> Direct pages scanned 32938 31429
>>> Kswapd pages scanned 2183166 2185293
>>> Kswapd pages reclaimed 2152359 2134389
>>> Direct pages reclaimed 32735 31234
>>> Kswapd efficiency 98% 97%
>>> Kswapd velocity 1243.877 1228.666
>>> Direct efficiency 99% 99%
>>> Direct velocity 18.767 17.671
>>> Percentage direct scans 1% 1%
>>> Zone normal velocity 299.981 291.409
>>> Zone dma32 velocity 962.522 954.928
>>> Zone dma velocity 0.142 0.000
>>> Page writes by reclaim 6278.800 5598.600
>>> Page writes file 0 0
>>> Page writes anon 6278 5598
>>> Page reclaim immediate 93 96
>>> Sector Reads 4357114 4307161
>>> Sector Writes 11053628 11053091
>>> Page rescued immediate 0 0
>>> Slabs scanned 1592829 1555770
>>> Direct inode steals 1557 2025
>>> Kswapd inode steals 46056 45418
>>> Kswapd skipped wait 0 0
>>> THP fault alloc 579 614
>>> THP collapse alloc 304 324
>>> THP splits 0 0
>>> THP fault fallback 793 730
>>> THP collapse fail 11 14
>>> Compaction stalls 1013 959
>>> Compaction success 92 69
>>> Compaction failures 920 890
>>> Page migrate success 238457 662054
>>> Page migrate failure 23021 32846
>>> Compaction pages isolated 504695 1370326
>>> Compaction migrate scanned 661390 7025772
>>> Compaction free scanned 13476658 73302642
>>> Compaction cost 262 762
>>>
>>> After this patch we see improvements in allocation success rate
>>> (especially for
>>> phase 3) along with increased compaction activity. The compaction stalls
>>> (direct compaction) in the interfering kernel builds (probably THP's)
>>> also
>>> decreased somewhat to kcompactd activity, yet THP alloc successes
>>> improved a
>>> bit.
>>
>>
>> Why you did the test with THP? THP interferes result of main test so
>> it would be better not to enable it.
>
>
> Hmm I've always left it enabled. It makes for a more realistic interference
> and would also show unintended regressions in that closely related area.
But, it makes review hard because complex analysis is needed to
understand the result.
Following is the example.
"The compaction stalls
(direct compaction) in the interfering kernel builds (probably THP's) also
decreased somewhat to kcompactd activity, yet THP alloc successes improved a
bit."
So, why do we need this comment to understand effect of this patch? If you did
a test without THP, it would not be necessary.
>> And, this patch increased compaction activity (10 times for migrate
>> scanned)
>> may be due to resetting skip block information.
>
>
> Note that kswapd compaction activity was completely non-existent for reasons
> outlined in the changelog.
>> Isn't is better to disable it
>> for this patch to work as similar as possible that kswapd does and
>> re-enable it
>> on next patch? If something goes bad, it can simply be reverted.
>>
>> Look like it is even not mentioned in the description.
>
>
> Yeah skip block information is discussed in the next patch, which mentions
> that it's being reset and why. I think it makes more sense, as when kswapd
Yes, I know.
What I'd like to say here is that you need to care current_is_kswapd() in
this patch. This patch unintentionally change the back ground compaction thread
behaviour to restart compaction by every 64 trials because calling
curret_is_kswapd()
by kcompactd would return false and is treated as direct reclaim.
Result of patch 4
and patch 5 would be same.
Thanks.
> reclaims from low watermark to high, potentially many pageblocks have new
> free pages and the skip bits are obsolete. Next, kcompactd is separate
> thread, so it doesn't stall allocations (or kswapd reclaim) by its activity.
> Personally I hope that one day we can get rid of the skip bits completely.
> They can make the stats look apparently nicer, but I think their effect is
> nearly random.
>
>>> @@ -3066,8 +3071,7 @@ static bool prepare_kswapd_sleep(pg_data_t *pgdat,
>>> int order, long remaining,
>>> */
>>> static bool kswapd_shrink_zone(struct zone *zone,
>>> int classzone_idx,
>>> - struct scan_control *sc,
>>> - unsigned long *nr_attempted)
>>> + struct scan_control *sc)
>>> {
>>> int testorder = sc->order;
>>
>>
>> You can remove testorder completely.
>
>
> Hm right, thanks.
>
>>> -static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
>>> - int
>>> *classzone_idx)
>>> +static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
>>> {
>>> int i;
>>> int end_zone = 0; /* Inclusive. 0 = ZONE_DMA */
>>> @@ -3166,9 +3155,7 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t
>>> *pgdat, int order,
>>> count_vm_event(PAGEOUTRUN);
>>>
>>> do {
>>> - unsigned long nr_attempted = 0;
>>> bool raise_priority = true;
>>> - bool pgdat_needs_compaction = (order > 0);
>>>
>>> sc.nr_reclaimed = 0;
>>>
>>> @@ -3203,7 +3190,7 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t
>>> *pgdat, int order,
>>> break;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - if (!zone_balanced(zone, order, 0, 0)) {
>>> + if (!zone_balanced(zone, order, true, 0, 0)) {
>>
>>
>> Should we use highorder = true? We eventually skip to reclaim in the
>> kswapd_shrink_zone() when zone_balanced(,,false,,) is true.
>
>
> Hmm right. I probably thought that the value of end_zone ->
> balanced_classzone_idx would be important when waking kcompactd, but it's
> not used, so it's causing just some wasted CPU cycles.
>
> Thanks for the reviews!
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists