lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 3 Mar 2016 18:49:04 -0500
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	lokesh jaliminche <lokesh.jaliminche@...il.com>
Cc:	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
	Xiong Zhou <xzhou@...hat.com>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>, linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext2/3 using ext4 module mkdir IO error on pmem DAX mount

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 10:49:51PM +0530, lokesh jaliminche wrote:
> Hi,
>    I have tested it locally I am also getting same error but not
> consistently. I have put some debug logs for debugging, as per the logs
> it seems that block_group is not getting initialized properly. I am
> not sure weather this is because of my patch. Need to debug more.

I'm quite sure it's your patch, so I'm going to drop it for now.  Note
that with ext3, we don't have flex_bg's (the flex_bg size is 1).

Here's a reliable repro:

	kvm-xfstests --no-log -c ext3 generic/003

For more about kvm-xfstests

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/fs/ext2/xfstests-bld.git/tree/quick-start?h=META

Output from running this test:

BEGIN TEST ext3: Ext4 4k block emulating ext3 Thu Mar  3 18:39:33 EST 2016
DEVICE: /dev/vdd
MK2FS OPTIONS: -q -O ^extents,^flex_bg,^uninit_bg,^64bit,^metadata_csum,^huge_file,^dir_nlink,^extra_isize
MOUNT OPTIONS: -o block_validity,nodelalloc
FSTYP         -- ext4
PLATFORM      -- Linux/i686 kvm-xfstests 4.5.0-rc2-00026-g1f2d779
MKFS_OPTIONS  -- -q -O ^extents,^flex_bg,^uninit_bg,^64bit,^metadata_csum,^huge_file,^dir_nlink,^extra_isize /dev/vdc
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o acl,user_xattr -o block_validity,nodelalloc /dev/vdc /vdc

generic/003             [18:39:35][   13.096353] run fstests generic/003 at 2016-03-03 18:39:35
[   14.859764] EXT4-fs error (device vdc): ext4_get_group_desc:288: comm mkdir: block_group >= groups_count - block_group = 850480444, groups_count = 40
[   16.944808] EXT4-fs (vdc): warning: mounting fs with errors, running e2fsck is recommended
[   16.956276] EXT4-fs error (device vdc): ext4_get_group_desc:288: comm mkdir: block_group >= groups_count - block_group = 3221700656, groups_count = 40
[   19.023011] EXT4-fs (vdc): warning: mounting fs with errors, running e2fsck is recommended
[   22.104702] EXT4-fs (vdc): warning: mounting fs with errors, running e2fsck is recommended
 [18:39:46] - output mismatch (see /results/results-ext3/generic/003.out.bad)
    --- tests/generic/003.out   2016-02-29 22:18:21.000000000 -0500
    +++ /results/results-ext3/generic/003.out.bad       2016-03-03 18:39:46.587676694 -0500
    @@ -1,2 +1,46 @@
     QA output created by 003
    +mkdir: cannot create directory '/vdc/dir1': Input/output error
    +./tests/generic/003: line 93: /vdc/dir1/file1: No such file or directory
    +stat: cannot stat '/vdc/dir1/file1': No such file or directory
    +cat: /vdc/dir1/file1: No such file or directory
    +stat: cannot stat '/vdc/dir1/file1': No such file or directory
    +ERROR: access time has not been updated after accessing file1 first time
    ...
    (Run 'diff -u tests/generic/003.out /results/results-ext3/generic/003.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)
Ran: generic/003
Failures: generic/003
Failed 1 of 1 tests

(In fact a huge number of tests fail using the ext3 configuration, but
generic/003 is a quick fast test.  Before submitting patches, please
run at the very least "kvm-xfstests smoke".  Admittedly, for this bug
the smoke test wouldn't have been enough.  You would have needed
"kvm-xfstests-g quick", or preferably, "kvm-xfstests -g auto".
Alternatively, you can use gce-xfstests, which uses Google Compute
Engine where you can just fire off the tests, and it will send you
e-mail with the test results.  See
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/fs/ext2/xfstests-bld.git/tree/kvm-xfstests/README.GCE
for more information.)

							- Ted

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ