[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 20:25:05 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] watchdog: atlas7_wdt: test clock rate to avoid
division by 0
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 11:33:36PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
>
> The clk API may return 0 on clk_get_rate, so we should check the result before
> using it as a divisor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> ---
>
> Should go individually via subsystem tree.
>
> drivers/watchdog/atlas7_wdt.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/atlas7_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/atlas7_wdt.c
> index df6d9242a31958..ed80734befae16 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/atlas7_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/atlas7_wdt.c
> @@ -154,6 +154,11 @@ static int atlas7_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> writel(0, wdt->base + ATLAS7_WDT_CNT_CTRL);
>
> wdt->tick_rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
> + if (!wdt->tick_rate) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err1;
> + }
> +
> wdt->clk = clk;
> atlas7_wdd.min_timeout = 1;
> atlas7_wdd.max_timeout = UINT_MAX / wdt->tick_rate;
> --
> 2.7.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists