linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] Remove dl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 Mar 2016 10:03:39 +0100
From:	luca abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
To:	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
	vincent.guittot@...aro.org, wanpeng.li@...mail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Remove dl_new

On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:46:55 +0000
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On 24/02/16 14:53, luca abeni wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:42:49 +0100
> > Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:57:04AM +0100, Luca Abeni wrote:
> > > > switched_to_dl() can be used instead
> > > 
> > > This seems unrelated to the other patches, and looks like a nice
> > > cleanup.
> > 
> > Ok; I'll rebase the patch on master and I'll run some more serious
> > tests (Juri, your tests repository is available on github, right?
> > Can I assume that if the patch passes your tests then it is ok?).
> > If everything goes well, I'll submit the patch.
> > 
> 
> Yes, tests reside here https://github.com/jlelli/tests. They should
> give you some confidence that things are not completely broken, but
> of course they might be still broken and you do not notice by running
> such tests. :-)
I am trying these tests, but... Some scripts use "schedtool"; where can
I find a proper version of it (supporting SCHED_DEADLINE)?
I tried https://github.com/scheduler-tools/schedtool-dl but it does not
seem to work correctly...



			Thanks,
				Luca