[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 07:47:51 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@...iumnetworks.com>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/6] arm64: Move unflatten_device_tree() call earlier.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:56 PM, David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com> wrote:
> From: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
>
> In order to extract NUMA information from the device tree, we need to
> have the tree in its unflattened form.
>
> Move the call to unflatten_device_tree() into paging_init(). This
> puts it before the call to bootmem_init(), which is where the NUMA
> information is extracted.
Can't you just move up unflatten_device_tree in setup_arch rather than
hiding in paging_init?
> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 7 +++----
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists