[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 09:12:50 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
stable-rt@...r.kernel.org, Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 07/17] arm64: replace read_lock to rcu lock in
call_step_hook
On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 09:53:00 +0530
Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> > index 636ba8b6240b..f66d668ffce9 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> > @@ -190,19 +190,22 @@ static void clear_regs_spsr_ss(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > /* EL1 Single Step Handler hooks */
> > static LIST_HEAD(step_hook);
> > DEFINE_RWLOCK(step_hook_lock);
> > +static DEFINE_RWLOCK(step_hook_lock);
>
> I think, this got wrong during backporting, no?
> Should have been
> -DEFINE_RWLOCK(step_hook_lock);
>
Crap! Yep you are right. I screwed this up. I'll go fix it. Luckily,
that patch ended there. It didn't affect 3.12 or earlier.
Thanks for catching that.
-- Steve
> > +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(step_hook_lock);
>
> ~Pratyush
Powered by blists - more mailing lists