[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 09:48:09 -0500
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
cov@...eaurora.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
ravikanth.nalla@....com, lenb@...nel.org, harish.k@....com,
ashwin.reghunandanan@....com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] acpi, pci, irq: account for early penalty assignment
Taking another stab at it.
On 3/2/2016 10:14 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Taking a step back here and also some inspiration from your code, why don't we
> fix the actual problem instead of redesigning the whole thing?
I read your email multiple times. I think you want to move the x86 specific pieces
(ISA interrupts and its command line arguments) out of the drivers\acpi\pci_link.c.
Is this right?
- the legacy ISA IRQs, i.e., the contents of acpi_irq_isa_penalty[]
- acpi_irq_isa= from command line
int pcibios_irq_penalty(int irq)
{
if (irq >= ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQ)
return 0;
return acpi_irq_isa_penalty[irq] + acpi_irq_cmd_line_penalty[irq];
}
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists