[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 10:12:43 -0500
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
cov@...eaurora.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
ravikanth.nalla@....com, lenb@...nel.org, harish.k@....com,
ashwin.reghunandanan@....com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] acpi, pci, irq: account for early penalty assignment
On 3/3/2016 10:10 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> That was my idea, but your minimal patch from last night looks awfully
> attractive, and maybe it's not worth moving it to arch/x86. I do think we
> could simplify the code significantly by getting rid of the kzalloc and
> acpi_irq_penalty_list from acpi_irq_set_penalty(). How about pushing on
> that a little bit first, and see what it looks like then?
OK. Let me go that direction.
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists