[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56D9354E.9040908@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 15:12:14 +0800
From: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: gleb@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Remove redundant smp_mb() in the kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page()
On 2016年03月04日 15:21, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2016, Lan Tianyu wrote:
>
>> The following kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() will call smp_mb() inside and so
>> remove smp_mb() here.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 6 ------
>> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>> index a54ecd9..6315416 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>> @@ -2383,12 +2383,6 @@ static void kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page(struct kvm *kvm,
>> return;
>>
>> /*
>> - * wmb: make sure everyone sees our modifications to the page tables
>> - * rmb: make sure we see changes to vcpu->mode
>
> You want to leave the comment explaining the memory barriers and tell that
> kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() contains the smp_mb().
That sounds more reasonable. Will update. Thanks.
>
>> - */
>> - smp_mb();
>> -
>> - /*
>> * Wait for all vcpus to exit guest mode and/or lockless shadow
>> * page table walks.
>> */
>> --
>> 1.8.4.rc0.1.g8f6a3e5.dirty
>>
>>
--
Best regards
Tianyu Lan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists