lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 09:46:48 +0200 From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com> To: Russel Winder <russel@...der.org.uk>, Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Graham Whaley <graham.whaley@...ux.intel.com> Subject: Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit On Fri, 04 Mar 2016, Russel Winder <russel@...der.org.uk> wrote: > On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 15:23 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: >> 1) the python version (asciidoc) appears to have been abandoned in >> favor of the ruby version. > > This is I think true, however the Java-based tool chain Asciidoctor is > I believe the standard bearer for ASCIIdoc these days, albeit called > ASCIIdoctor. If we're talking about the same asciidoctor (http://asciidoctor.org/) it's written in ruby but you can apparently run it in JVM using JRuby. Calling it Java-based is misleading. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists