linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Specify valid DMA mask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <27028474.SJJak25cUc@wuerfel>
Date:	Fri, 04 Mar 2016 09:38:21 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
Cc:	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Specify valid DMA mask

On Friday 04 March 2016 15:43:56 Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, I'm not too sure what is the point of setting the fake mask to
> > be honest, but you are definitely right that it is a contradiction to
> > call a DMA function on a device that is not DMA-capable.
> 
> Ah, I finally got it - we are just setting it to the *address* of
> host->dma_mask so the device's DMA mask does not end up being a NULL
> pointer.
> 
> That actually changes things a bit. DMA-capable devices are clearly
> expected to set the mask themselves, but the only one to do it is
> host/mtk-sd.c. And dma_set_mask() is only called in dw_mmc and
> sdhci-acpi's enable_dma callback.
> 
> This means most DMA-capable devices (including Tegra, but not only)
> are simply left with no DMA setup at all.
> 
> Probably we can detect when the host did not do any DMA setup in the
> probe function and attempt some sane defaults depending on what the
> hardware says it is capable of?

When the host leaves an empty DMA mask, the intended meaning is
that the device is not on a DMA capable bus, so if we run into
that case, we should instead fix the creation of the device
rather than the driver that looks at the data.

	Arnd