[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <40df18b49e7fe4ec9ab93f68c33661ee291149bd.1457082108.git.jslaby@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 10:02:19 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haehnle@....com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 094/116] drm/radeon: hold reference to fences in radeon_sa_bo_new
From: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haehnle@....com>
3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
===============
commit f6ff4f67cdf8455d0a4226eeeaf5af17c37d05eb upstream.
An arbitrary amount of time can pass between spin_unlock and
radeon_fence_wait_any, so we need to ensure that nobody frees the
fences from under us.
Based on the analogous fix for amdgpu.
Signed-off-by: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haehnle@....com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c
index f0bac68254b7..bb166849aa6e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c
@@ -349,8 +349,13 @@ int radeon_sa_bo_new(struct radeon_device *rdev,
/* see if we can skip over some allocations */
} while (radeon_sa_bo_next_hole(sa_manager, fences, tries));
+ for (i = 0; i < RADEON_NUM_RINGS; ++i)
+ radeon_fence_ref(fences[i]);
+
spin_unlock(&sa_manager->wq.lock);
r = radeon_fence_wait_any(rdev, fences, false);
+ for (i = 0; i < RADEON_NUM_RINGS; ++i)
+ radeon_fence_unref(&fences[i]);
spin_lock(&sa_manager->wq.lock);
/* if we have nothing to wait for block */
if (r == -ENOENT && block) {
--
2.7.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists