[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2562091.6cJRuD3dK9@wuerfel>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 16:57:15 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gnurou@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] mmc: sdhci: Set DMA mask when adding host
On Friday 04 March 2016 19:38:43 Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Set the DMA mask in sdhci_add_host() after we determined the
> capabilities of the device. 64-bit devices in particular are given the
> proper mask that ensures bounce buffers are not used.
>
> Also disable DMA if no proper DMA mask can be set, as the DMA-API
> documentation specifies.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index fd9139947fa3..00fb45ba6f39 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -2857,6 +2857,34 @@ struct sdhci_host *sdhci_alloc_host(struct device *dev,
>
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sdhci_alloc_host);
>
> +static int sdhci_set_dma_mask(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> + struct mmc_host *mmc = host->mmc;
> + struct device *dev = mmc_dev(mmc);
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (host->quirks2 & SDHCI_QUIRK2_BROKEN_64_BIT_DMA)
> + host->flags &= ~SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA;
> +
> + /* Try 64-bit mask if hardware is capable of it */
> + if (host->flags & SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA) {
> + ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
> + if (ret)
> + pr_warn("%s: Failed to set 64-bit DMA mask.\n",
> + mmc_hostname(mmc));
> + }
> +
I think you need to disable the SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA flag when
dma_set_mask_and_coherent() fails here. Otherwise looks good.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists