linux-kernel - [PATCH 2.6.32 14/55] readv/writev: do the same MAX_RW

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160304153001.323194518@1wt.eu>
Date:	Fri, 04 Mar 2016 16:30:14 +0100
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: [PATCH 2.6.32 14/55] readv/writev: do the same MAX_RW_COUNT truncation that
 read/write does

2.6.32-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>

commit 435f49a518c78eec8e2edbbadd912737246cbe20 upstream.

We used to protect against overflow, but rather than return an error, do
what read/write does, namely to limit the total size to MAX_RW_COUNT.
This is not only more consistent, but it also means that any broken
low-level read/write routine that still keeps counts in 'int' can't
break.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
---
 fs/read_write.c    | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 include/linux/fs.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
index b7f4a1f..ab80120 100644
--- a/fs/read_write.c
+++ b/fs/read_write.c
@@ -210,8 +210,6 @@ bad:
  * them to something that fits in "int" so that others
  * won't have to do range checks all the time.
  */
-#define MAX_RW_COUNT (INT_MAX & PAGE_CACHE_MASK)
-
 int rw_verify_area(int read_write, struct file *file, loff_t *ppos, size_t count)
 {
 	struct inode *inode;
@@ -546,65 +544,71 @@ ssize_t rw_copy_check_uvector(int type, const struct iovec __user * uvector,
 			      unsigned long nr_segs, unsigned long fast_segs,
 			      struct iovec *fast_pointer,
 			      struct iovec **ret_pointer)
-  {
+{
 	unsigned long seg;
-  	ssize_t ret;
+	ssize_t ret;
 	struct iovec *iov = fast_pointer;
 
-  	/*
-  	 * SuS says "The readv() function *may* fail if the iovcnt argument
-  	 * was less than or equal to 0, or greater than {IOV_MAX}.  Linux has
-  	 * traditionally returned zero for zero segments, so...
-  	 */
+	/*
+	 * SuS says "The readv() function *may* fail if the iovcnt argument
+	 * was less than or equal to 0, or greater than {IOV_MAX}.  Linux has
+	 * traditionally returned zero for zero segments, so...
+	 */
 	if (nr_segs == 0) {
 		ret = 0;
-  		goto out;
+		goto out;
 	}
 
-  	/*
-  	 * First get the "struct iovec" from user memory and
-  	 * verify all the pointers
-  	 */
+	/*
+	 * First get the "struct iovec" from user memory and
+	 * verify all the pointers
+	 */
 	if (nr_segs > UIO_MAXIOV) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
-  		goto out;
+		goto out;
 	}
 	if (nr_segs > fast_segs) {
-  		iov = kmalloc(nr_segs*sizeof(struct iovec), GFP_KERNEL);
+		iov = kmalloc(nr_segs*sizeof(struct iovec), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (iov == NULL) {
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
-  			goto out;
+			goto out;
 		}
-  	}
+	}
 	if (copy_from_user(iov, uvector, nr_segs*sizeof(*uvector))) {
 		ret = -EFAULT;
-  		goto out;
+		goto out;
 	}
 
-  	/*
+	/*
 	 * According to the Single Unix Specification we should return EINVAL
 	 * if an element length is < 0 when cast to ssize_t or if the
 	 * total length would overflow the ssize_t return value of the
 	 * system call.
-  	 */
+	 *
+	 * Linux caps all read/write calls to MAX_RW_COUNT, and avoids the
+	 * overflow case.
+	 */
 	ret = 0;
-  	for (seg = 0; seg < nr_segs; seg++) {
-  		void __user *buf = iov[seg].iov_base;
-  		ssize_t len = (ssize_t)iov[seg].iov_len;
+	for (seg = 0; seg < nr_segs; seg++) {
+		void __user *buf = iov[seg].iov_base;
+		ssize_t len = (ssize_t)iov[seg].iov_len;
 
 		/* see if we we're about to use an invalid len or if
 		 * it's about to overflow ssize_t */
-		if (len < 0 || (ret + len < ret)) {
+		if (len < 0) {
 			ret = -EINVAL;
-  			goto out;
+			goto out;
 		}
 		if (unlikely(!access_ok(vrfy_dir(type), buf, len))) {
 			ret = -EFAULT;
-  			goto out;
+			goto out;
+		}
+		if (len > MAX_RW_COUNT - ret) {
+			len = MAX_RW_COUNT - ret;
+			iov[seg].iov_len = len;
 		}
-
 		ret += len;
-  	}
+	}
 out:
 	*ret_pointer = iov;
 	return ret;
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 860cb6d..acfad75 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1817,6 +1817,7 @@ extern int current_umask(void);
 /* /sys/fs */
 extern struct kobject *fs_kobj;
 
+#define MAX_RW_COUNT (INT_MAX & PAGE_CACHE_MASK)
 extern int rw_verify_area(int, struct file *, loff_t *, size_t);
 
 #define FLOCK_VERIFY_READ  1
-- 
1.7.12.2.21.g234cd45.dirty