lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160305125215.GC3567@htj.duckdns.org>
Date:	Sat, 5 Mar 2016 07:52:15 -0500
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@...il.com>
Cc:	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	lizefan@...wei.com, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
	Liran Liss <liranl@...lanox.com>,
	"Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
	Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, james.l.morris@...cle.com,
	serge@...lyn.com, Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
	Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>, raindel@...lanox.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 1/3] rdmacg: Added rdma cgroup controller

Hello, Parav.

On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 04:45:09PM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote:
> Design that remains same from v6 to v10.
>   * spin lock is still fine grained at cgroup level instead of one
> global shared lock among all cgroups.
>      In future it can be optimized further to do per cpu or using
> single lock if required.
>   * file type enums are still present for max and current, as
> read/write call to those files is already taken care by common
> functions with required if/else.
>   * Resource limit setting is as it is, because number of devices are
> in range of 1 to 4 count in most use cases (as explained in
> documentation), and its not hot path.

1 and 2 are not okay.  3 is fine but resource [un]charging is not hot
path?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ