[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56DE1341.4080206@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 10:48:17 +1100
From: James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
dingel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, bob.picco@...cle.com,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@...cle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, chris.hyser@...cle.com,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
xiexiuqi@...wei.com, Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity
(ADI)
On 03/08/2016 06:54 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> This makes sense, but I still think the design is poor. If the hacker
> gets code execution, then they can trivially brute force the ADI bits.
>
ADI in this scenario is intended to prevent the attacker from gaining
code execution in the first place.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists