lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1AE640813FDE7649BE1B193DEA596E883BB608C0@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 7 Mar 2016 06:36:05 +0000
From:	"Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>
To:	Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@...il.com>
CC:	"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>,
	"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ACPICA: Events: Execute some _REG methods in early boot

Hi,

First of all, why don't you respond on the kernel bugzilla?
Posting a fix here directly without communication doesn't look like a constructive help but more like a destructive attack to me.

> From: linux-acpi-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-acpi-
> Subject: [PATCH] ACPICA: Events: Execute some _REG methods in early boot
> 
> The regression caused _REG methods to not be run in early boot for all
> space IDs, but a removed comment stated that _REG methods should be
> executed for IDs like embedded_controller. Before the regression this
> was the case:
> 
> [    0.230469] Executing  Method       \_SB.PCI0.LPCB.EC._REG
> [    0.230531] Initializing Region       \GNVS
> [    0.230607] Initializing Region       \_SB.PCI0.LPCB.EC.ECOR
> [    0.231043] Initializing Region       \_SB.PCI0.IGPU.IGDM
[Lv Zheng] 
As I said in the previous reply, this is the known issue and can be fixed by applying the whole series.
Especially this commit:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8241421/
That's why I asked you to test again by applying the whole series.
And that's why after having not seen your response for so long time, we prepared a test branch and was waiting for your response.

You need to post acpidump there to have the issue root caused so that more accurate fix can be generated.

> 
> After the regression the initialisation is not done and ODEBUG warnings
> are shown at boot and/or shutdown:
> 
> [    6.676570] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3317 at lib/debugobjects.c:263
> debug_print_object+0x85/0xa0()
> [    6.676576] ODEBUG: assert_init not available (active state 0) object type:
> timer_list hint: stub_timer+0x0/0x20
> [    6.676578] Modules linked in:
> [    6.676582] CPU: 0 PID: 3317 Comm: ccpd Not tainted 4.5.0-rc6 #509
> [    6.676584] Hardware name: Apple Inc. MacBookPro10,2/Mac-
> AFD8A9D944EA4843, BIOS MBP102.88Z.0106.B0A.1509130955 09/13/2015
> [    6.676586]  0000000000000000 ffff880256543db0 ffffffff814802b5
> ffff880256543df8
> [    6.676590]  ffffffff81f40dbd ffff880256543de8 ffffffff810bd0ec
> ffff880256543e90
> [    6.676594]  ffffffff822532c0 ffffffff81f40e63 ffffffff83138c88
> 0000000001fdf040
> [    6.676598] Call Trace:
> [    6.676603]  [<ffffffff814802b5>] dump_stack+0x67/0x92
> [    6.676608]  [<ffffffff810bd0ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7c/0xb0
> [    6.676611]  [<ffffffff810bd167>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x47/0x50
> [    6.676614]  [<ffffffff8149d7a5>] debug_print_object+0x85/0xa0
> [    6.676616]  [<ffffffff8111f440>] ? cascade+0x70/0x70
> [    6.676620]  [<ffffffff8149e398>] debug_object_assert_init+0xf8/0x130
> [    6.676624]  [<ffffffff811038cd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
> [    6.676626]  [<ffffffff8111fcff>] del_timer+0x1f/0x70
> [    6.676631]  [<ffffffff811852f1>] laptop_sync_completion+0x61/0x100
> [    6.676633]  [<ffffffff81185290>] ? laptop_io_completion+0x30/0x30
> [    6.676637]  [<ffffffff81212c9f>] sys_sync+0x7f/0x90
> [    6.676641]  [<ffffffff81ad0d97>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
> 
> Fixes: efaed9be998b ("ACPICA: Events: Enhance acpi_ev_execute_reg_method()
> to ensure no _REG evaluations can happen during OS early boot stages")
> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/3/273
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112911
> Signed-off-by: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpica/evregion.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evregion.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evregion.c
> index 47092b4d633c..d0b02ef0effa 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evregion.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evregion.c
> @@ -590,6 +590,7 @@ acpi_ev_execute_reg_method(union
> acpi_operand_object *region_obj, u32 function)
>  	union acpi_operand_object *args[3];
>  	union acpi_operand_object *region_obj2;
>  	acpi_status status;
> +	bool sp;
> 
>  	ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(ev_execute_reg_method);
> 
> @@ -598,9 +599,28 @@ acpi_ev_execute_reg_method(union
> acpi_operand_object *region_obj, u32 function)
>  		return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_NOT_EXIST);
>  	}
> 
> +	/*
> +	 * For the default space_IDs, (the IDs for which there are default region
> handlers
> +	 * installed) Only execute the _REG methods if the global initialization
> _REG
> +	 * methods have already been run (via acpi_initialize_objects). In other
> words,
> +	 * we will defer the execution of the _REG methods for these
> space_IDs until
> +	 * execution of acpi_initialize_objects. This is done because we need
> the handlers
> +	 * for the default spaces (mem/io/pci/table) to be installed before we
> can run
> +	 * any control methods (or _REG methods). There is known BIOS code
> that depends
> +	 * on this.
> +	 *
> +	 * For all other space_IDs, we can safely execute the _REG methods
> immediately.
> +	 * This means that for IDs like embedded_controller, this function
> should be called
> +	 * only after acpi_enable_subsystem has been called.
> +	 */
> +
> +	sp = (region_obj->region.space_id ==
> ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY ||
> +	      region_obj->region.space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO ||
> +	      region_obj->region.space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_PCI_CONFIG ||
> +	      region_obj->region.space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_DATA_TABLE);
>  	if (region_obj2->extra.method_REG == NULL ||
>  	    region_obj->region.handler == NULL ||
> -	    !acpi_gbl_reg_methods_enabled) {
> +	    (sp && !acpi_gbl_reg_methods_enabled)) {
>  		return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_OK);
>  	}
> 
[Lv Zheng] 
The above fix looks hackish to me.
IMO, if you want to stop regressions that are triggered by this commit.
A simpler and proper way would be to move acpi_gbl_reg_method_enabled = TRUE to the end of acpi_load_tables().
So that when the order of table loading and ECDT probing is corrected, the correct logic can still apply.

I don't have ECDT platforms in hand to confirm.
Can you help to just give it a try?

Thanks and best regards
-Lv

> --
> 2.1.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ