[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160307140852.GD27675@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:08:52 +0000
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
To: Linn Crosetto <linn@....com>
Cc: ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, roy.franz@...aro.org, mingo@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64/efi: query Secure Boot status according to
UEFI spec
On Thu, 03 Mar, at 02:45:48PM, Linn Crosetto wrote:
> This series modifies the function that queries the status of UEFI Secure Boot
> in the EFI stub to match the UEFI specification, and allow the caller to
> determine if it is enabled, disabled, or in an unknown state due to an
> unexpected error from GetVariable().
>
> v2:
> - Add return values for unexpected errors
> - Split changes into two patches
>
> v3:
> - Add more verbosity with additional prints
>
> Linn Crosetto (2):
> arm64/efi: report unexpected errors when determining Secure Boot status
> arm64/efi: check SetupMode when determining Secure Boot status
>
> drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
Thanks Linn, I've picked these two patches up with Ard's and Mark's
tags.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists