[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160307.134233.201526978853409580.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 13:42:33 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dhowells@...hat.com
Cc: linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] rxrpc: Add a common object cache
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 14:38:06 +0000
> Add a common object cache implementation for RxRPC. This will be used to
> cache objects of various types (calls, connections, local and remote
> endpoint records). Each object that would be cached must contain an
> obj_node struct for the cache to use. The object's usage count and link
> pointers are here, plus other internal metadata.
>
> Each object cache consists of a primary hash to which all objects of that
> type must be added and a secondary hash to which objects may also be added
> and removed a single time. Objects are automatically removed from both
> hashes when they expire.
>
> Objects start off life with a usage count of 2 - one for the cache and one
> for the caller. When an object's usage count is reduced to 1, it sits in
> the cache until its expiry time is reached, at which point the cache
> attempts to reduce the count to 0 and, if successful, clean it up. An
> object with a usage count of 1 in the cache can be looked up and have its
> usage count increased, thereby stopping the expiry process.
>
> Objects are looked up, unlinked and destroyed under RCU-safe conditions.
>
> A garbage collector cycles through all the hash buckets in the primary hash
> and compares the expiry times of the usage-count-1 objects to the current
> time, removing any that have expired. This is kicked by a single timer for
> the whole cache rather than having a timer per object.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
I know you put a lot of time and effort into this, but I want to strongly
recommend against a garbage collected hash table for anything whatsoever.
Especially if the given objects are in some way created/destroyed/etc. by
operations triggerable remotely.
This can be DoS'd quite trivially, and that's why we have removed the ipv4
routing cache which did the same.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists