linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 10/26] mtd: nand: omap: Update DT binding documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 7 Mar 2016 10:58:05 -0800
From:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To:	Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
Cc:	tony@...mide.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
	ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar, javier@...hile0.org, fcooper@...com,
	nsekhar@...com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/26] mtd: nand: omap: Update DT binding documentation

On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:46:24AM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 05/03/16 04:04, Brian Norris wrote:
> > Is it normal to mix types of addressing in a single 'reg' property? Is
> > your code working for anything besides CS==0?
> 
> Yes we're using non zero CS on different omap platforms.
> I haven't changed the behaviour of the reg property in this series. Just updated the documentation.
> 
> I didn't understand what you meant by mixing type of addressing.
> 
> This usage is exactly as mentioned here
> http://devicetree.org/Device_Tree_Usage#Ranges_.28Address_Translation.29

I think I was just misunderstanding the use of the reg, *-cells, and
ranges properties here. Thanks for the pointer.

Brian