linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dma: sun4i: expose block size and wait cycle configuration to DMA users

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160307203024.GD8418@lukather>
Date:	Mon, 7 Mar 2016 21:30:24 +0100
From:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
	linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com,
	Emilio López <emilio@...pez.com.ar>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma: sun4i: expose block size and wait cycle
 configuration to DMA users

On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 04:08:57PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
> 
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 20:24:29 +0530
> Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:59:31AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > +/* Dedicated DMA parameter register layout */
> > > +#define SUN4I_DDMA_PARA_DST_DATA_BLK_SIZE(n)	(((n) - 1) << 24)
> > > +#define SUN4I_DDMA_PARA_DST_WAIT_CYCLES(n)	(((n) - 1) << 16)
> > > +#define SUN4I_DDMA_PARA_SRC_DATA_BLK_SIZE(n)	(((n) - 1) << 8)
> > > +#define SUN4I_DDMA_PARA_SRC_WAIT_CYCLES(n)	(((n) - 1) << 0)
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * struct sun4i_dma_chan_config - DMA channel config
> > > + *
> > > + * @para: contains information about block size and time before checking
> > > + *	  DRQ line. This is device specific and only applicable to dedicated
> > > + *	  DMA channels
> > 
> > What information, can you elobrate.. And why can't you use existing
> > dma_slave_config for this?
> 
> Block size is related to the device FIFO size. I guess it allows the
> DMA channel to launch a transfer of X bytes without having to check the
> DRQ line (the line telling the DMA engine it can transfer more data
> to/from the device). The wait cycles information is apparently related
> to the number of clks the engine should wait before polling/checking
> the DRQ line status between each block transfer. I'm not sure what it
> saves to put WAIT_CYCLES() to something != 1, but in their BSP,
> Allwinner tweak that depending on the device.
> 
> Note that I'd be happy if the above configuration could go into the
> generic dma_slave_config struct. This way we could avoid per-engine
> specific APIs.

And I'd really like to avoid that too. That will avoid to cripple the
consumer drivers that might be using any of the two.

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)