[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160307211143.GE5083@two.firstfloor.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 22:11:43 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, acme@...nel.org,
jolsa@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: perf, tools: Refactor and support interval and CSV metrics
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 07:48:39PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 07:22:27PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:08:42AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 03:57:31PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >
> > > SNIP
> > >
> > > >
> > > > % perf stat -x, --metric-only -a -I 1000
> > > > 1.001381652,frontend cycles idle,insn per cycle,stalled cycles per insn,branch-misses of all branches,
> > > > 1.001381652,173.32,0.83,2.09,1.73,
> > > > 2.002073343,199.47,1.07,1.60,2.14,
> > > > 3.002875524,109.52,0.22,7.83,1.63,
> > > > 4.003970059,132.10,0.17,10.85,1.51,
> > > > 5.004818754,181.60,0.22,8.87,2.22,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Available in
> > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ak/linux-misc-2.6 perf/stat-metrics-21
> > >
> > > this branch contains old version of:
> > > perf, tools, stat: Add --metric-only support for -A
> >
> > Old in what way? Looks correct to me.
> >
> >
> > commit e26ba80593023c24c8276ad9853acd7e56ca92ed
> > Author: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> > Date: Sat Dec 19 11:22:55 2015 -0800
> >
> > perf, tools, stat: Add --metric-only support for -A
> >
> > Add metric only support for -A too. This requires a new print
> > function that prints the metrics in the right order.
> >
> > v2: Fix manpage
> > v3: Simplify nrcpus computation
> > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>
> I did not see the change for print_no_aggr_metric function
> in commit:
> perf, tools, stat: Add --metric-only support for -A
>
> which I saw in the email..
>
> however now im confused, I did not noticed I had a wrong tree,
> however git can't resolve the git tree you mentioned:
I pushed again. Can you try again? Probably I made some mistake with
git.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists