| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1457391064-6660-188-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:49:38 -0800
From: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 187/273] nfit: fix multi-interface dimm handling, acpi6.1 compatibility
4.2.8-ckt5 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
---8<------------------------------------------------------------
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
commit 6697b2cf69d4363266ca47eaebc49ef13dabc1c9 upstream.
ACPI 6.1 clarified that multi-interface dimms require multiple control
region entries (DCRs) per dimm. Previously we were assuming that a
control region is only present when block-data-windows are present.
This implementation was done with an eye to be compatibility with the
looser ACPI 6.0 interpretation of this table.
1/ When coalescing the memory device (MEMDEV) tables for a single dimm,
coalesce on device_handle rather than control region index.
2/ Whenever we disocver a control region with non-zero block windows
re-scan for block-data-window (BDW) entries.
We may need to revisit this if a DIMM ever implements a format interface
outside of blk or pmem, but that is not on the foreseeable horizon.
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
drivers/acpi/nfit.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
index cf0fd96..dc928d8 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
@@ -403,37 +403,16 @@ static void nfit_mem_find_spa_bdw(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
nfit_mem->bdw = NULL;
}
-static int nfit_mem_add(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
+static void nfit_mem_init_bdw(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
struct nfit_mem *nfit_mem, struct acpi_nfit_system_address *spa)
{
u16 dcr = __to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)->region_index;
struct nfit_memdev *nfit_memdev;
struct nfit_flush *nfit_flush;
- struct nfit_dcr *nfit_dcr;
struct nfit_bdw *nfit_bdw;
struct nfit_idt *nfit_idt;
u16 idt_idx, range_index;
- list_for_each_entry(nfit_dcr, &acpi_desc->dcrs, list) {
- if (nfit_dcr->dcr->region_index != dcr)
- continue;
- nfit_mem->dcr = nfit_dcr->dcr;
- break;
- }
-
- if (!nfit_mem->dcr) {
- dev_dbg(acpi_desc->dev, "SPA %d missing:%s%s\n",
- spa->range_index, __to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)
- ? "" : " MEMDEV", nfit_mem->dcr ? "" : " DCR");
- return -ENODEV;
- }
-
- /*
- * We've found enough to create an nvdimm, optionally
- * find an associated BDW
- */
- list_add(&nfit_mem->list, &acpi_desc->dimms);
-
list_for_each_entry(nfit_bdw, &acpi_desc->bdws, list) {
if (nfit_bdw->bdw->region_index != dcr)
continue;
@@ -442,12 +421,12 @@ static int nfit_mem_add(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
}
if (!nfit_mem->bdw)
- return 0;
+ return;
nfit_mem_find_spa_bdw(acpi_desc, nfit_mem);
if (!nfit_mem->spa_bdw)
- return 0;
+ return;
range_index = nfit_mem->spa_bdw->range_index;
list_for_each_entry(nfit_memdev, &acpi_desc->memdevs, list) {
@@ -472,8 +451,6 @@ static int nfit_mem_add(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
}
break;
}
-
- return 0;
}
static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
@@ -482,7 +459,6 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
struct nfit_mem *nfit_mem, *found;
struct nfit_memdev *nfit_memdev;
int type = nfit_spa_type(spa);
- u16 dcr;
switch (type) {
case NFIT_SPA_DCR:
@@ -493,14 +469,18 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
}
list_for_each_entry(nfit_memdev, &acpi_desc->memdevs, list) {
- int rc;
+ struct nfit_dcr *nfit_dcr;
+ u32 device_handle;
+ u16 dcr;
if (nfit_memdev->memdev->range_index != spa->range_index)
continue;
found = NULL;
dcr = nfit_memdev->memdev->region_index;
+ device_handle = nfit_memdev->memdev->device_handle;
list_for_each_entry(nfit_mem, &acpi_desc->dimms, list)
- if (__to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)->region_index == dcr) {
+ if (__to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)->device_handle
+ == device_handle) {
found = nfit_mem;
break;
}
@@ -513,6 +493,31 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
if (!nfit_mem)
return -ENOMEM;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nfit_mem->list);
+ list_add(&nfit_mem->list, &acpi_desc->dimms);
+ }
+
+ list_for_each_entry(nfit_dcr, &acpi_desc->dcrs, list) {
+ if (nfit_dcr->dcr->region_index != dcr)
+ continue;
+ /*
+ * Record the control region for the dimm. For
+ * the ACPI 6.1 case, where there are separate
+ * control regions for the pmem vs blk
+ * interfaces, be sure to record the extended
+ * blk details.
+ */
+ if (!nfit_mem->dcr)
+ nfit_mem->dcr = nfit_dcr->dcr;
+ else if (nfit_mem->dcr->windows == 0
+ && nfit_dcr->dcr->windows)
+ nfit_mem->dcr = nfit_dcr->dcr;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (dcr && !nfit_mem->dcr) {
+ dev_err(acpi_desc->dev, "SPA %d missing DCR %d\n",
+ spa->range_index, dcr);
+ return -ENODEV;
}
if (type == NFIT_SPA_DCR) {
@@ -529,6 +534,7 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
nfit_mem->idt_dcr = nfit_idt->idt;
break;
}
+ nfit_mem_init_bdw(acpi_desc, nfit_mem, spa);
} else {
/*
* A single dimm may belong to multiple SPA-PM
@@ -537,13 +543,6 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
*/
nfit_mem->memdev_pmem = nfit_memdev->memdev;
}
-
- if (found)
- continue;
-
- rc = nfit_mem_add(acpi_desc, nfit_mem, spa);
- if (rc)
- return rc;
}
return 0;
--
2.7.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists