linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 231/273] ipv6: addrconf: Fix recursive spin lock call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1457391064-6660-232-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Mon,  7 Mar 2016 14:50:22 -0800
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Erik Kline <ek@...gle.com>,
	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
	Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@...eaurora.org>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 231/273] ipv6: addrconf: Fix recursive spin lock call

4.2.8-ckt5 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

---8<------------------------------------------------------------

From: "subashab@...eaurora.org" <subashab@...eaurora.org>

[ Upstream commit 16186a82de1fdd868255448274e64ae2616e2640 ]

A rcu stall with the following backtrace was seen on a system with
forwarding, optimistic_dad and use_optimistic set. To reproduce,
set these flags and allow ipv6 autoconf.

This occurs because the device write_lock is acquired while already
holding the read_lock. Back trace below -

INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU { 1}  (t=2100 jiffies
 g=3992 c=3991 q=4471)
<6> Task dump for CPU 1:
<2> kworker/1:0     R  running task    12168    15   2 0x00000002
<2> Workqueue: ipv6_addrconf addrconf_dad_work
<6> Call trace:
<2> [<ffffffc000084da8>] el1_irq+0x68/0xdc
<2> [<ffffffc000cc4e0c>] _raw_write_lock_bh+0x20/0x30
<2> [<ffffffc000bc5dd8>] __ipv6_dev_ac_inc+0x64/0x1b4
<2> [<ffffffc000bcbd2c>] addrconf_join_anycast+0x9c/0xc4
<2> [<ffffffc000bcf9f0>] __ipv6_ifa_notify+0x160/0x29c
<2> [<ffffffc000bcfb7c>] ipv6_ifa_notify+0x50/0x70
<2> [<ffffffc000bd035c>] addrconf_dad_work+0x314/0x334
<2> [<ffffffc0000b64c8>] process_one_work+0x244/0x3fc
<2> [<ffffffc0000b7324>] worker_thread+0x2f8/0x418
<2> [<ffffffc0000bb40c>] kthread+0xe0/0xec

v2: do addrconf_dad_kick inside read lock and then acquire write
lock for ipv6_ifa_notify as suggested by Eric

Fixes: 7fd2561e4ebdd ("net: ipv6: Add a sysctl to make optimistic
addresses useful candidates")

Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Erik Kline <ek@...gle.com>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@...eaurora.org>
Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index 54fb696..ff6e0dc 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -3425,6 +3425,7 @@ static void addrconf_dad_begin(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp)
 {
 	struct inet6_dev *idev = ifp->idev;
 	struct net_device *dev = idev->dev;
+	bool notify = false;
 
 	addrconf_join_solict(dev, &ifp->addr);
 
@@ -3470,7 +3471,7 @@ static void addrconf_dad_begin(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp)
 			/* Because optimistic nodes can use this address,
 			 * notify listeners. If DAD fails, RTM_DELADDR is sent.
 			 */
-			ipv6_ifa_notify(RTM_NEWADDR, ifp);
+			notify = true;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -3478,6 +3479,8 @@ static void addrconf_dad_begin(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp)
 out:
 	spin_unlock(&ifp->lock);
 	read_unlock_bh(&idev->lock);
+	if (notify)
+		ipv6_ifa_notify(RTM_NEWADDR, ifp);
 }
 
 static void addrconf_dad_start(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp)
-- 
2.7.0